Rainer
Werner Fassbinder, 1982
Starring:
Brad Davis, Franco Nero, Jeanne Moreau, Laurent Malet
Querelle,
a Belgian sailor, lands in the port of Brest. He runs into his brother, Robert,
with whom he has a love-hate relationship, who is holed up in Feria, a local
brothel and bar. There, Querelle gets involved in opium dealing and murder, and
has an affair with Feria’s owner, Nono, as well as Nono’s wife, and the local
police chief. He also falls in love with Gil, a man who has murdered a
coworker, but ultimately betrays Gil by turning him in and pinning his own
murder on Gil. Querelle is also the target of a naval commander who is obsessed
with him and seems to be stalking him.
Based
on Jean Genet’s novel, Querelle de Brest,
Fassbinder’s final film, released months after his death, is certainly a
troubled one. His second English-language film and second film with an
international cast, Querelle is an
excellent adaptation of its source material, which is the cause of its triumphs
and flaws. This incredibly personal film – one of cinema’s first widely seen
examinations of gay relationships – is a departure from the blend of
accessibility and art house in Fassbinder’s BRD trilogy. The striking visual
world of Querelle is vibrant, yet aggressively
artificial, an evolution of his work on The
Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant, Martha, Chinese Roulette, and Nora Helmer.
Like
Effi Briest, Bolwieser, and Pioneers in Ingolstadt, among others, Querelle is set in an imaginary time and
place. However, unlike these earlier films, it does not seem to have a
relationship to actual history, but exists in a dream world of the liminal
impulses between sex and violence, liberation and destruction. The themes of salvation
and martyrdom present in many of his earlier films appear here, as Querelle
seems to be on a quest for sexual or emotional liberation that takes the path
of abjection: crime, murder, drug use, cruelty, betrayal, and, above all, anal
sex. That forbidden pleasure – little seen in literature or cinema, and always
controversial in both – is the locus point of desire and masculine identity in Querelle. Jack Sergeant, in an article
on Serge Gainsbourg’s banned and little-seen film about heterosexual anal sex, Je t’aime
moi non plus (1976), writes: “If discussed at all, anal sex is seen
predominately as a Sadean fixation and hardcore porn staple. Certainly it is
never viewed as an act of love.”
For
both Genet and Fassbinder, it is a layered act, one that evokes the feminine
and the masculine, violence and intimacy, hate and love, becoming and abandonment,
blood, shit, and come. Homosexuality straddles the line between understood and
forbidden in Querelle; men seduce
other men while discussing their attraction for women. Others play a dice game
for the privilege to have sex with Nono’s wife, the brothel madam, but the
losers must have sex with Nono. Some men, including Querelle, lose
intentionally, but are able to save face because they are merely following the
rules of the game. Anal sex is the key to both the port of Brest and to Feria,
which functions as a Technicolor hell and a sexually explicit rendering of Pinocchio’s Pleasure Island (and its
source material, Circe’s island) all in one.
Fassbinder’s
fascination with the criminal – including theft, murder, and terrorism -- and the
sexually explicit, as well as his identity as a gay man, made him perhaps uniquely
suited to adapt Genet’s work. But there are undeniable flaws, primarily because
Genet’s novels do not lend themselves well to cinematic adaptation. All the
film’s characters are ciphers that explore distant and unknowable parts of the
human psyche. Querelle is fascinating, but utterly unlikable. Though Fassbinder
had a number of protagonists that could be described this way – including those
of Effi Briest, Martha, The Bitter Tears
of Petra von Kant, Satan’s Brew, Lili Marleen, and many more – Querelle suffers the most for it. In Despair and Nora Helmer – two of Fassbinder’s other adaptations – he gradually
reveals the enigmatic protagonists through their relationships with others. But
Querelle’s exchanges with other characters are often reduced to the physical
and frustratingly retreat into the suggested and the symbolic.
The
performance of spaghetti western and Italian crime film star Franco Nero (one
of my favorite actors) is a key example of this. Though he is always compelling,
Nero’s performance as the voyeuristic Lieutenant Seblon is ultimately baffling.
He acts as a sort of stand-in for Fassbinder, an ever-present peeping Tom who
is distant from the action but comments on it through narration (a favorite
device of Fassbinder’s). Unfortunately, Nero’s character lacks much narrative
force and ends the film resolving very little, though he is finally united with
Querelle in the potential beginning of a romantic relationship.
Another
strange presence is French star Jeanne Moreau as the brothel madam, the film’s
only female character. She performs a widely hated musical number – an original
song set to Oscar Wilde’s “Ballad of Reading
Gaol,” a poem about the inexorable connection between love and death, sex
and violence – that speaks to Fassbinder’s love of camp. Moreau’s black-clad performance
– similar to Marlene Dietrich’s lazy, yet suggestive musical romps, especially
her later years in films like Touch of
Evil and Rancho Notorious –
recalls the frequent cabaret songs throughout Fassbinder’s career, all of which
focus on scantily clad, sexually suggestive women who cannot sing (such as Lili Marleen, Gods of the Plague, and Mother Küsters Goes to Heaven).
This
blend of confrontational erotica, transgression, camp, and a highly artificial
visual world will not be for everyone and, along with Satan’s Brew and The Third
Generation, Querelle is one of
Fassbinder’s most unusual, challenging films. It’s available on DVD
and is a must-see for Genet fans and for anyone who appreciate Fassbinder’s
more difficult, obscure works. It’s certainly not a failure, but, like
Fassbinder’s early films and the later Lili
Marleen, Querelle is a work of
Brechtian distancing, intentional obscurity, and is deeply, uncomfortably
personal film that stands as a fitting epilogue to one of cinema’s most
prolific and brilliant careers.
No comments:
Post a Comment